Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35mm versus 120
From: Bernard <4829.g23@g23.relcom.ru>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 20:59:31 +0300

Austin Franklin wrote:

> > Tests show that the emulsion/filmplane  in a Hasselblad
> > is far from flat and even
>
> What tests would you be referencing?  I have never seen this
> 'problem'. Perhaps, I am just not astute enough, and you could help me
> identify it.  I have 20,000+ negatives, and I am sure if it were such
> a problem, I would easily be able to identify it on some of them with
> some help.

Oh Austin, before you continue your angry rant, take a look at:

http://www.smu.edu/~rmonagha/mf/flat.html

At least you'll know what is being spoken about.


>  I am really
> surprised that in 20 years of shooting with Hasselblads, I have never
> before had anyone mention this as being a problem.  If that were such
> a
> problem for MF, than it must be a really huge problem for LF.
>
> > The 2/90
> > apo gives me at 2 better image quality than the 4/150 at 4 and when
> > stopping down the apo to 4 it surpasses the Hasselbald 4/150.
>
> Would you please provide references to these tests that bare out your
> conclusion.  You certainly have shown you know what you are talking
> about,
> but I respectfully question your conclusion here.