Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Horst - You misunderstand my post, which probably says more about my posting abilities than your interpretive ones...:-) My point is that there are folks - not you - who will look down their noses disdainfully at a "Cosina" lens, a piece of "off-brand Japanese garbage," but will instantly snap up the same lens if it carries a venerable European brand name....So I'm saying Cosina isn't ashamed of their name - after all, they do sell the lenses as Cosinas - but rather is being clever in its marketing. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of A.H.SCHMIDT Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 1:02 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] 50mm f1.5 Nokton question B. D. Colen wrote: > Horst Schmidt opined: > > In my opinion, Cosina could not care less about the history or the accuracy > of > this lens names. It is a shame. But then what do you expect, if a company is > to > ashamed to use > there own name on the products they manufacture. > > ----- > Ashamed? Hardly. It's simply proof that Cosina is smart enough to know that > there are some idiots to whom the name of a lens is as - or more - important > than its performance. OK, This is a fair comment, but why then not be accurate in the naming of the lenses ? > > > 'What? It's not German? It was made in JAPAP? It has to be crap!' > > I am not suggesting that this is Horst's opinion, but I would certainly > suggest that there are enough Leica acquirers out there who feel that way to > make it worth Cosina's while to give the badge a "rich" photographic > heritage. I wrote in my original post:"I would have written the same, if a company from the US, Germany, France or even Upper Volta had done this". This would make your above comment somewhat meaningless. I really don't believe, that goods have to have the made in Germany Logo to be good. On the contrary. I have in my time managed to acquire some dreadful stuff which was made in Germany: Software (in my opinion they are quite bad at it), Some of the german made cameras where defiantly not of the highest standards, That includes even the latest Voigtlander models. Vito C's and later. I have a Collection of Pentax cameras and lenses From the mid 50's to the mid 80s. To me this are superb cameras and lenses. My favorite being the multicoated 50mm f 1.4. mounted on to the Super-A Camera When I need to by new tools for myself , I mostly go and by either american made (e.g.. Snap-On) or english made (Eclipse and More and Right etc.) and when I want a good cheese, I buy a Brie or Camembert from France, a firmer cheese from Switzerland (Appenzeller) or from Austria (Moosbacher) and when it has to be a soft cheese, then I by it here from Australia (Four Square etc.) So the old cliché: " It has to be from the Fatherland, and all else is rubbish, does not carry any weight with me, and most probably most other senile people. Regards, Horst Schmidt > > > B. D.