Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There appears to be extraordinary variability in Russar quality. As I mentioned, I believe that I got one of the good ones. No way would I describe its wide-open performance as "really terrible." If you had a bad one, then the Heliar will look a lot better . . . Chandos >I just sold mine. I was happy to see it go. It was terrible wide open, >really terrible. I've shot some frames with Mike Stone's 15 which I haven't >had a chance to develop yet, but I'll make a comparison when I do. > >-- >Johnny Deadman > >photos: http://www.pinkheadedbug.com >music: http://www.jukebox.demon.co.uk Chandos Michael Brown Assoc. Prof., History and American Studies College of William and Mary http://www.wm.edu/CAS/ASP/faculty/brown