Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 05:16 PM 3/5/00 -0800, drodgers@nextlink.com wrote: > >I have no concerns regarding the 35/1.4 ASPH. Except that I wonder how much >better it might perform than my 50/1.4 Summilux. Has anyone used both and >how do the two compare in practice? > >David > I have both. They are entirely different lenses. My 35/1.4 ASPH lives primarily in a body containing Fuji MS 100/1000. The 50/1.4 lives on a body containing Tri-X. Sometimes they swap places. The 50/1.4 is a Bokeh lens as is my 75/1.4. The 35/1.4 ASPH is not as is not my 24 ASPH. The signature of the ASPH lenses is quite different from the non ASPH lenses. You cannot compare them. They are just different. I made some 20x24 Cibachromes from transparencies taken with my 35/1.4 ASPH. It looks like MF. Sharp from corner to corner. Ciba's from my 75/1.4 or 50/1.4 have a glow that is unmistakenly Leica. Jim