Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Originally achromats were corrected only for two wavelengths - but I do not know what a super-achromat might be. All the best! Raimo photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen - -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Päivä: 01. maaliskuuta 2000 19:31 Aihe: Re: [Leica] apo definitions >Erwin Puts wrote: >><Snip> They should have added; " and so are >> most if not all of the consumer photographic lenses". But then Nikon >> has photographic lenses with the designation 'APO" and no enlarging >> lenses with that sticker? >> >> Erwin > >Having recently run into the use of the tern Tele-SuperAchromat in the >Hasselblad literature I was under the impression they were telling me it was >even better corrected 4 colors instead of 3?!. >Four colors?! RGB and black!?:) >Which four colors they might be talking about never ceases to amuse me CMYB?!:) >That's an APO of a different color! >I'm sure it's more than hype. >Mark Rabiner >