Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>Please explain to me what "truly apochromatic" is in relation to an enlarging lens.<<< Erwin, I'm sure there is nothing I can tell you that you don't already know, but as I understand it, there are two distinct definitions of "apochromatic": one simply means a lens that has been "corrected" for three primary spectral colors, and the other, stricter definition is a lens that gives three images of identical size for three different spectral lines or regions. IOW, the looser definition implies the attempt to correct, and the stricter definition implies success in the attempt. Ray refers to the latter as "true" apochromatic correction. As you know, there are few camera lenses and some process lenses that are true apochromats, but not nearly as many as say "Apo" on them. Cf. Ray, p. 283: "Some lenses are designated 'apochromatic' but are not truly so; they just have a reduced secondary spectrum, which certainly improves performance.... The very few true apochromatic lenses used for direct screening work are rather long focus relative to the format, have correction extended to 750 nm, and are very expensive." The intelligence that no current consumer enlarging lenses are true apochromats comes from Nikon Special Optics. - --Mike