Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You know I have at various times read that you do not need the finder for the: 28mm when using the .72 finders as the outside edges are a good guide. 24mm when using the .72 finders as the outside edges are a good guide. 21mm when using the .72 finders as the outside edges are a good guide. What next the 15mm! John Collier Oh yeah, Yahoo. > From: "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:49:26 -0800 > Subject: Re: [Leica] 21mm vs. 24mm > > I have the 21mm Asph. and finder, and was playing with it last night. I > thought the extremes of the viewfinder in the 0.72 corresponded very closely > with the 21mm brightline finder's view. However, with the brightline finder > there is very little intrusion of the lens into the field of view, and the > finder gets blurry when you are straining to see the edges of the field. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:18 PM > Subject: RE: [Leica] 21mm vs. 24mm > > >> With the .72, you don't need a viewfinder for the 24. That's why I chose > the 24 over the 21... >> >> ---------- >> From: pfang >> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 6:29 PM >> Subject: [Leica] 21mm vs. 24mm >> >> >> Folks - >> >> Need your thoughts in regards to choosing between a 24 >> vs. 21, both the newest model. >> >> I would shoot primarily landscapes...and have heard >> both are amazing performers...but the viewfinder is a >> bit of a pain >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!?