Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Right, but they supposedly aren't as optically good as the second version, so why would someone pay 2x for it? I guess if you HAVE to have every lense made...but that's getting a bit anal even for me... Austin - ---------- From: Greg.Chappell@bankofamerica.com Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 3:15 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] FS: 35 1.4 aspherical (1st ver) I think this must be the "Real" Aspherical 35 that came before the current model, Austin. They are much, much more expensive (collectors). That's why he has (1st Ver) in the description. Greg - -----Original Message----- From: Austin Franklin [mailto:austin@darkroom.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 1:28 PM To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' Subject: RE: [Leica] FS: 35 1.4 aspherical (1st ver) If that's USD, it can't be an M lense...they go for mid to low $2k new.... - ---------- From: Ting Lee Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 1:26 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] FS: 35 1.4 aspherical (1st ver) Hi all, For sale like new 35 1.4 aspherical with hood no box or papers $3300 best, Ting