Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Colour seems still to be a problem in some circles. B+W gives things a kind of spurious seriousness (a kind of "this is _real_ reportage" thing) and many photographers (including the mighty HCB) have inveighed against the use of colour in photography. This attitude is still around, as evidenced by the fact (for instance) that _all_ the recent winners of the MoJO Photofund competition submitted portfolios in B+W. It is striking how many of the "great" photojournalists, even recent ones, work in B+W in preference to colour. There is definitely a cultural bias in this direction. I wonder why it is that so many people say that B+W concentrates on the essential, formal aspect of things and colour is somehow distracting? Surely colour is a formal parameter as well, as well as being native to our way of seeing things. It also renders the mood of the light in a way that B+W does not, I think. Of course, B+W is very _convenient_! It would be great if therre was a slide film with the latitude of triX... Personally, from what I remember of it, I liked Eggleston's stuff and, in the documentary realm, I think that Falkland Road represents a high mark in photojournalism per se which even MEM has not achieved since. Does anybody here know of the work of Gianfranco Ghirri, a northern Italian photographer who shot colour? Extraordinary sensitivity to light. As a final remark, I have to say that I'm amazed by the intolerance for other people's achievements and convictions eviddenced here and on the LEG. Truly amazing and amusing. All for now, Rob. Robert Appleby and Sue Darlow Via Bellentani 36 41100 Modena Italy Tel/fax [39] 059 303436