Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Guy, Thanks for your post and risking the flames. I found the discussion of art almost as distressing about the never-ending car discussion, but for different reasons. It bothers me that people seem so quick to point out what they don't like, or understand. Look, there are a lot of photographers whose work I don't like, but that doesn't mean that their work is bad. Sometimes it really is that I just don't get it. When I was in art school I began as a very literal artist -- I painted what was in front of me as an object. However the more I drew and painted, the more abstract my work became, simply as the result of learning to look in a different way from what I was used to. My bookshelf has room for both Cartier Bresson AND William Eggleston, and I get something valuable from both. Tim >lugfolk thick and thin, > >i feel i have to weigh in on the issue of 'art' photography. while i agree >that a lot of it is rubbish (the same is true of much 'non-art' >photography, by the way), i certainly do not agree that so-called art >photographers are all a bunch of sloppy or talentless photographers whose >work is essentially incomprehensible unless we 'get' the inside jokes that >inform it. (rest snipped in the interest of space)