Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Which is better M Series lens 21 f/2.8 or 24 f/2.8
From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 08:43:44 -0800
 
At 10:26 AM 2/14/00 -0500, Tina Manley wrote:
>
>I have both [24 & 21] and they are both excellent lenses.  I find that I
use the 24 
>more often because I can use it without a finder.  I've managed to lose and 
>break several 21mm finders and that gets expensive!  I also hate having to 
>switch back and forth between the finder and the rangefinder.  If I need to 
>go wider than 24, I usually use the 19 on the R.
>
>Leically,
>
>Tina Manley, ASMP

Perfect. Exactly the way I see it and do it. The 21/24 M aux finder is a
total piece of junk. I have a 24 finder for my 24 ASPH. I won't use it. It
is the worst designed POC I have ever burned $300 for. I want my money back.

Jim Brick, ASMP