Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Lenshood v. filters
From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:38:43 -0800

Austin Franklin wrote:
> 
> It's called INSURANCE.... ;-)
> 
> [Austin] I've been through this...they only consider damage that can be
> proven to impair the FUNCTION of the insured item to be covered.  Cosmetics
> are not covered.  One of our photographers dropped a Nikon, it had a dent
> the size of Kentucky...but didn't impair its function at all...they said it
> wasn't covered.  The resale value of the camera was severely reduced by
> this damage..but that's was just too bad for us.
> 
> Let's see... A Noctilux with no damage to the glass, or a Noctilux with a
> scratch in the front element....would you pay the same for both?  Even
> though, you KNOW it has no effect on the actual image...  Cheap insurance,
> in my book, is a filter...
> 
It's never a good idea to actually USE a camera. You run the risk of severely
damaging it or at least making it wear.
One should never take ones precious camera out of the hermetically sealed glass case!
Maybe a roll or two on a nice thick carpeted living room to keep things going.
Mark