Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] F3 and 105 mm F2.5
From: Mike Quinn <mlquinn@san.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 18:48:41 -0800

Mark Rabiner wrote:

> My mid 70's vintage 105 mm F2.5 was my favorite lens for most of my career
> which
> started then.
> I think it was most peoples favorite lens then who shot people, portraits,
> fashion in 35mm. Nikon owned the field then it seemed to me.
> I did the vast majority of my work with it, it was banged up and I bought it
> that way.
> The 105 mm f2.8 macro does not replace it it is too heavy to use as much. How
> many dandelions can you shoot!
> The 85 F2 would squash people on full length shots, I had to use the 105.
> But now I use the 90 Elmarit on my Leica M with the Leica Winder and it's a
> whole new ballgame.


But... Mark, what's this about the 85 f2 squashing people? I was going to
buy one for my daughter. I thought the 105 might be a tad too big for her
(and anyway I'm still reluctant to part with it). Is she likely to get
squashed? Or just her friends? Please explain.