Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree wholeheartedly. Bob, good to see someone on the LUG is open minded. PK - -----Original Message----- From: Robert Bedwell [mailto:rlb@triad.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2000 10:56 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji building an M Peter.....you are correct, in my opinion. However, this doesn't mean that they should replace the existing M6. There is and will continue to be a demand for a manual system. Leica cannot continue to operate an unprofitable public company. They are backed in the corner and to continue R&D they must progress and a marriage with a profitable photographic company is a sure thing in my opinion. I would certainly purchase one as you have described because of the lenses. After all it is the picture that we are after isn't it? Bob - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2000 12:31 PM Subject: [Leica] Fuji building an M > Having read loading problems cause by the M bottom loading system, I too had > a similar problem. I hope that if Fuji buys Leica they will force them into > designing an easier and smarter loading system. The botom loading was good > in the 30's but come on, what a pain in the ass. > Better yet, imagine a modern M design (similar to the XPan) made by Fuji > with average and spot metering, a 100% viewfinder (like the M3) that will > allow use of more focal lengths especially wide angle, a metal shutter > curtain to gain faster shutter and faster flash sync speeds and not worry > about holes in the darn curtain, with motorized loading with a flip up back > like every other manufacturer uses including Leica's R cameras. Face it, > the reason we use the M is not the camera, its the lenses which have > transcended time with their wonderful resolution capabilities. If Fuji > built an M like Konica I would certainly be interested, especially if it use > M glass. > > Peter K