Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alexey: Man am I glad to find someone (anyone) on this list that appreciates the M6 for what it IS. I bought mine about two years ago because it was the ultimate tool for what I wanted. Low light, no flash, quiet people photography. I did my homework, I knew about the film loading, the rangefinder focusing, the lenses, the manual exposure before I bought. Heck, those were some of the REASONS I bought it. I like it, I have no need to change it and don't want to even if I could. When I need a different tool because my subjects are outside the reasons I bought the M6, I'll add a body and lens for that job - not complain that something I already bought doesn't do something it didn't do before I paid good money to buy it. JEEESH, I feel better now. Thanks! Rick > Face it, Peter. The reasons that you have for using the M are > different than the reasons that *I* have for using it. For > me the bodies are primary and the lenses are secondary, but > wonderful, benefits. > > Your weighting of features is different than others'. > Get over it. > > I use the Leica because I love the finder, I love the way the > body feels in my hands, I love the sound of the shutter and > the design philosophy that anything that does not add, detracts. > I would not want a metal shutter; I do not have problems with > loading; I do not require faster flash sync or motorized loading. > > Here is the deal: you think that a Martin D18 acoustic guitar > should be "upgraded" with double pickups and a whammy bar, to > make it more like a Fender Stratocaster. Peter, if you want an > electric guitar, Peter, *don't* buy an acuostic guitar and then > complain that it should be designed more like a solid body > electric guitar. > > If I wished for the features you specify I would buy a Hexar RF > or a G2 or - much better yet - an EOS1n or F100 or Maxxum 9. And > guess what: with judicious lens choices, these cameras would deliver > essentially similar optical performance to the M. > > Alexey > >