Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No apologies required, IMHO, Andrew. I think the whole joke, taken in its photographic context is quite humourous, and the punchline is so unexpected. That is the point of the joke, whether it was Clinton or some other public figure, it does capture the foibles, and primary concerns of Joe Q. Photographer. I would have used a wide aperture, in order to stop the action of the rushing floodwaters best. :) Noel Charchuk On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Andrew M. Moore wrote: > > > > Come on....Like Clinton? substitute the name of some public figure you > > don't like...It's Friday afternoon, it's a funny joke, and it did at least > > have a tangential link to photography..... > > Thank you B.D. At least someone got a laugh. > > > there are many Democrat LUGGERS that will be offended by this. > > Well, this democrat poster wasn't. He laughed because he was in a good > mood and wanted to share a funny photography joke with people who it > might connect with. Hey, I did use "OT:" in the subject line. > > Really, my sincere apologies to those that it offended. Given that, > now go extract the remaining funnyness out of the joke and enjoy your > weekend (maybe replace "Clinton" with "Andrew"?) > > --Andrew > NO ARCHIVE >