Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>pretty lassiez-faire attitude Mike. Is this the kindler, gentler, you?<<< Not really. It seems contradictory, to have strong personal preferences yet also to claim "it doesn't matter." The point is that I use what I do because I believe in it, I can make it work, and I love its look. When I look at the work of other photographers, I look for that same strength of purpose and commitment in their work. You can usually tell if it's there. I'd rather look at good, committed work done on my least favorite film than look at mediocre work done with my favorite film. I also think it's crucial to be able to be open-minded enough to be able to distinguish between good and bad in types of work that you hate. It's a quality that's essential in a critic. Some work "speaks" to you directly, emotionally, personally. You have strong feelings about it. But you shouldn't count on that, or dismiss everything else; it's not enough just ot love one kind of work if you want to learn what's what with art. You also have to be able to detect quality in styles of work that aren't "natural" for you to appreciate. A lot of stuff out there is just in bad taste. Or it was done by people who just don't get it. I'm not talking about that. I can love Tri-X and hate Tech Pan yet also admit the possibility that other photographers can do excellent work with Tech Pan. Those two stances may seem contradictory, but they aren't. It's just that one is about me doing my thing, and the other is about them doing their thing. - --Mike