Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]the Kiev 5 is indeed a very interesting and relatively unknown camera, but it is also a rare camera, even in Russia. the lever advance also has a reputation for being less than reliable. Stephen Gandy Mark Langer wrote: > Let me add to the answers about the Contax and Kiev a suggestion that > people seek out a nice Kiev 5. This has many of the virtues of the > earlier Contaxes and Kievs (except for the neat focus wheel on the body) > and adds to them a wonderfully contrasty rangefinder with parallax-compensated > bright line finder, with bright lines for 50mm and 85mm. Using the entire > finder gives you a good, but non-parallax compensated 35mm and the > rangefinder patch is an adequate 135mm. The camera is nicely finished and > has a built-in meter and side-mounted rewind crank. While the film > advance is not exactly M Leica smooth, it works well with both lever and > knob wind - this is the only camera that I can think of with this feature. > > The downside is that the camera is somewhat bulkier than the earlier > Kiev/Contaxes, and not as well balanced in the hand with the 50mm lens > mounted. However, it is better balanced with the 85mm f2 mounted. And I > can say from experience that it is a joy to use. > > The Kiev 5 indicates the direction that Zeiss might have gone in to > produce a camera more competitive with the M Leica. Definitely one of the > great examples of an underrated camera.