Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The tonal rendition is also strongly influenced by the shape and slope of the characteristic curve. Any film has a density range of zero to 3.0 (in log units). Any stop difference results in a value of 0.3. So theoretically any film can accommodate 10 stops if you go for a 45 degree contrast index, that is 1.0 . Now it is more natural to use a 0.7 value and that results in the claim that a film can handle 15 stops. This is not true of course. The effective range of a film is from 0.1 to 1.4, that is a range of 1.3, This range can accommodate 7 stops when we use the CI value of 0.7 and 9 stops if we use a CI value of 0.5. Lowering the CI value is the same as underdeveloping the film. If we now use the seven stop range as a standard, we see from the non-linear characteristic curve that the rendition of tonal differences depends on two things. The steepness of the straight portion and th selection of the portion of the tonal scale of the subject you want to record faithfully. In the toe and shoulder of the film curve things are compressed and so do not record correctly. We may like this compression effect, mind you. If we now have a Tri-X film with a characteristic curve that is sagging a little in the midtone area we compress the midtones and flatten contrast, making it look like a Tmax neg. On the other hand I can use a developer that gives the curve an upward shape in the midtones and so enhance micro contrast in the midtones. In this way I can use T-max film and give it a look as a Tri-X film. You need suitable developer, careful exposure etc, but it can be done. Not an exact emulation but close. We should also be aware of the absolute tonal difference between two grey values. If the differences in reality are small, we will make them smaller still when using a CI value of 0.5. It may be that the differences become too small to be perceptible. (re Fechner's law). So if we are going to compare the tonal rendition of two film emulsions we should use identical subject tonal ranges AND identical CI values. Otherwise any comparison goes wrong. Same as with lenses that is. Current Tri-X is not the same emulsion as it was in the past. There are a number of changes, making it behave a bit more like Tmax. At least the amount of silver is reduced and so presumably is the range of grain sizes. Erwin Please note: all my articles about technical matters, even when posted on the Lug/Leg are copyright by me. Do not use without due references.