Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] tri-x: why I stopped using it
From: chucko@siteconnect.com (Chuck Albertson)
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 16:56:07 -0800

Are you talking about 35mm film? Tri-X Pan Professional (ISO 320, with a
long-scale curve) is only made in medium format (120/320). I think the Tri-X
Pan Pro you're referring to is good old Tri-X, with the "Pro" hooked onto it
as some kind of marketing flash.

>
> I stopped using Tri-X  Pan (the one with 5063 marked on the film between
> the frame numbers) because none of the three shops around here
> (Eimsbüttel,
> Hamburg, Germany) where I used to get it  stocks it any more. Instead they
> have Tri- Pan Pro which is rated at 400. Photo Tech magazine say that: '
> Tri-X Pan and Tri-X Pan Professional are wholly different films without
> much in common besides their manufacturer and name.' They say the Pro is
> only available as roll and sheet film and that the speed is 320. Contrary
> to this, the Xtol tables say Tri-X Pro has a nominal speed of 400 in 35 mm
> (and 320 in 120/620 format). This got me confused, so I started using
> HP5plus which I like very much. Still I would appreciate somebody telling
> me the if there is any difference between the 5063 Tri-X and the Tri-X Pan
> Pro, if there is any.
>
>