Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On a related note, the middle apertures seem to be where you can really see differences in background out of focus areas. Take a look at a Zeiss Planar f1.4, compared to a Summicron M, both set at f4, with lots of pinpoint bright highlights in the background. You will be amazed at the "clarity" of the aperture blades in the Planar...VERY ANNOYING! At full aperture nearly all lenses have round out of focus areas. Stop down a bit and it's a different story! Good to see you back, Dan States Chicago Illinois. > >Sander van Hulsenbeek's impromptu bokeh test was indeed interesting. > >The blur or "bo-ke" will vary depending on: the aperture, the set focus >distance, the distance of the out-of-focus objects from the plane of >focus, and the contrast of the out-of-focus objects. Generally, the >toughest test for any lens is > > a. wide open, > b. with the focus set close, > c. with high contrast o-o-f objects far in the distance. > >Few lenses pass such a test very well. > >I could tell from his test that he had the older Summicron set very near >to wide open. Its really doesn't come into its own until f/5.6; beyond >that, its blur is really remarkably beautiful. > >I'm very glad to know that the new lens does so well wide open! His >test indicates that it is indeed quite pretty. Interestingly, this is >where the f/1.4 Summilux ASPH does its best, too--at the most extreme >conditions. One could argue that good "bokeh" under those conditions is >most useful. Thanks to him for taking the trouble to post those >pictures. > >--Mike J. / _PHOTO Techniques_ magazine > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com