Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Was it Marc who wrote >Which means you must have two camera systems with duplications in investment, weight, and so forth< ? Duplications? Oh yes. Lemme see. That box over there is Leica rangefinder......That big bag is Nikon SLR and so is the little one beside it, the big one under the window is Pentax 6x7 and the black box under the desk is 5x4.......Each one of these systems has a full range of lenses with it. It's about the right tools for the job, and the notion of "right tool" is as much defined by the individual user and the specific job as any academic notion of what will or won't work. The above paragraph might make me sound like a gadget freak, but I'm not- just over the years I've realised that I like to use certain cameras in certain situations, and because photography has always been my major income, I am justified in indulging that. Some duplication is inevitable, and anyway, it's not really duplication- for example, taking lenses which cover the same picture area for their format, the Jupiter 85mm f2 I use on an M is a totally different lens from the 85mm f2 Nikkor, the 165mm f2.8 Takumar is different again, as is the 10-inch Ross....... (But all of them are gorgeous lenses in their own way). Notwithstanding the pleasure I take in using my Ms, or any of my other cameras come to that, if I was to be told that I could only keep one camera system, it would have to be a 35mm SLR. They're not perfect, and in many situations they are big and heavy and awkward with unreasonably dim viewfinders (sic), but like adjustable wrenches, they will just about do anything, and with long lenses they simply can't be beat. I love those "photosniper" outfits that put a Leica or similar with Viso on a rifle stock, and I'm old enough (just) to remember when the Novoflex version was quite commonplace for action photography- but with the climate as it is in UK, walk out the door with one of those under your arm and you'd be arrested by a gun-toting "special weapons" police squad. I imagine the same would happen elsewhere, and I can't see how you'd use something like a Visoflex for sport or action without such an arrangement. On another point, someone was saying they wanted to buy an SLR to complement their M and wanted a motordrive and autofocus- trust me, most people don't need the autofocus. If you have trouble focussing, update the eye prescription (I fully accept that AF can allow people with really defective vision to keep on snapping, but that does not apply to most of us). There's a pretty strong anti Canon bias around here, but I'm tough enough to suggest a S/H Canon T90, which will take the older FD lenses (the new Canons won't, so the lenses are cheap, and they are very good). Alternatively a Nikon FE2 or FM2 with MD12 motor, but the Canon has a better metering system. Nikon did not catch up till the F4. If you're loaded, buy a Leica R- there is no question about the quality of these - but if you bought the above instead, together with a few lenses etc, you'd have enough change for another M body or a couple of lenses................. BTW the only way you can convert an SLR into a rangefinder is to trade it in for an M! Cheers Rod