Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi friends, I had the opportunity to handle a demo camera at one of the dealers in town. These are my initial impressions: 1. Features. It certainly has a lot of bells and whistles which M owners have been waiting for (and even secretly lusting for). I got the impression that the top plate is a wee bit cluttered but then you have shutter speed and exposure compensation dials to reckon with. I wonder why Konica could not merge them together like way the Contax G is doing. 2. Handling. The camera felt solid and had good weight like my M6. However, the Hexar is squarish whereas the M6 is rounded. It took me a while to get used to and like the roundness of the M6 body and sine then have never looked back. My hands were not quite ready to grapple with the extra edges of the hexar. It was just not that aesthetically satisfying to hold. 3. Shutter. The hexar has a faster top shutter speed. I often use my M6 with 400 films and open up my lens to f1.4-2. In certain lighting conditions, 1/1000 sec was just not fast enough. The hexar has certainly much to offer in this aspect. Tripping the shutter gave out a rather distinct metallic squeaky sound, and this is followed by the winder sound. Having been used to the whisper quiet shutter of my M6, I am particularly annoyed by this. Again, having made hexars which were whisper quiet in the silent mode, I am surprised that Konica has allowed this to happen. 4. Viewfinder. Bright and clear enough. RF focussing was easily achieved. I think the frame lines could be a bit brighter. The 28mm frame lines were particularly dimmish. At AE mode, I had to make the conscious effort to look for the shutter speed readouts which were illuminated by LEDs. That means that I tend to lose my concentration on my subject. In addition, having been spoilt by the much easier to read LCD displays, LEDs seem like neon lights illuminating in a seedy district. I did not get the chance to load and shoot, mount my M-lens on it and check out the rest of the many features. Now the $64,000 question.... Will it replace my M6? Nope. While this new kid in the block may steal some limelight, it is just not like using an M6. There is an inherent satisfaction and pleasure in handling an M6 inspite of its simplicity. Yes, that very simplicity may be the reason why the M6 is so endearing. I would expect many who have never owned a leica to buy a Hexar and use leica lenses on it. After all, a new hexar body is retailing for US$1110 with orders expected to arrive in March 2000 in Singapore. $1110 is a very decent price to pay for a body with so many bells and whistles. However, I see the hexar highly desirable as a second body. With its ease of use and additonal functions, I would carry it to fulfill those occasions when a TTL flash is required, when a motor drive and fast speeds are a must in action and sports, and quick film changes make every second counts. Loading an M6 is still a relatively fiddly affair for many of us diehard leica enthusiasts. There seem to be an initial strong interest in the hexar RF with many orders being made. I would personally wait for any teething problems to be ironed out and the price to drop after the initial interest dies down. Dan K.