Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] incidently
From: Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:07:27 +0100

>Ted Grant wrote:
>>
>> I've watched a bunch of professional photographers metering several
>> sections within a scene and then discuss their exposures with others doing
>> the same thing, merely creating great confusion because one guy's meter
>> gives him 1/2 stop more or less than three others.
>>
>
>A man with a watch will always know the currect time.  A man with two
>watches never knows.
>
>M.
>
>--
>Martin Howard                     |

Don't you guys bracket? I don't either. I halfbracket. Which means that  in
addition to the metered reading I don't do a couple of underexposures and a
couple of overexposures, but just one additional exposure. At least for
black and white, it is usually sufficient to make one additional exposure
if you are unsure. Go two stops away from the meter reading as the film and
multigrade papers can easily handle one stop off exposures. I generally
overexpose in relation to the metered reading. That takes care of bright
spots in the metered area. Anyway living up north as I do, bright light is
not generally the commonest of problems. But lacking shadow details are.

This thread has brought a lot of interesting stuff, thanks to all contributors.

(Martin: Mee too, I will never buy a sling either. This advertising is
contraproductive.)