Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 12/22/99 10:00:57 AM Central Standard Time, TEAShea@aol.com writes: << This is true. The Constitution is a living documents - not a dead, lifeless piece of paper. It will probably continue to change through the interpretations of the Supreme Court as our country changes. It is a good thing. It works. Tom Shea >> Fourth graders can do a better job interpreting the Constitution than the liberal judges who just substitute their Marxist philosophy for commonly understood words. Marxism and the Constitution are in direct contradiction to each other so the liberals must resort to selling the gullible public that the Constitution is a "living" document that is subject to being rewritten by lifetime appointed federal judges who answer to absolutely no one. It is just a liberal ploy that the Constitution is a "living" document. Not one word of the Constitution has changed in over 200 years. If it is to be changed, just amend it by letting the people it governs vote for whatever changes they deem are necessary. Probably the first thing to go would be the first ten amendments known as the "Bill of Rights." There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution that requires honest hard working people to pay the huge criminal defense bills that busted crooks ring up. There is nothing in the Constitution that requires the police to tell crooks they do not have to answer any questions asked by the police. The list goes on and on. This liberal assault on the Constitution began during the Roosevelt years and gets worse with each passing year. Of course, the Federal income tax was held unconstitutional until it was amended by the people who were told it would never rise above 2% of their income. Buzz was right on.