Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]sometime around 12/16/99 8:15 AM, Larry Kopitnik at kopitnil@marketingcomm.com was heard to write: > The POP Photo methodology is optically sound. They analyse a lens on five > or six parameters they deem important and then use a weighted average to > arrive at the SQF values. It is the selection of parameters and this > weighting that undervalues the Leica lenses in most cases. What they > measure and the way they measure it are in itself correct. That's all well and good, but how do you call accurate a test that shows Leica lenses as undervalued? There is something wrong with their evaluations of the results and anyone's thinking who believs this is fine. - -- Eric Welch Carlsbad, CA http://www.neteze.com/ewelch Zen master to hotdog vendor. "Make me one with everything."