Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]But there is no longer a relationship with Minolta. It would have to be reestablished, in which case they may opt for Konica instead. - -----Original Message----- From: Tom Schofield [mailto:tdschofield@email.msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 11:03 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Konica HEXAR RF Lenses reviewed in CI #220 If we all want to keep speculating, perhaps the Minolta rangefinder which Mr. Gandy has rumored is in the works will get a Leica badge, as did the CL & as Hasselblad did for the X-Pan. Tom Schofield - ----- Original Message ----- From: B. D. Colen <bdcolen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 5:40 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] Konica HEXAR RF Lenses reviewed in CI #220 > That's the message....Peter K bet that the Konica would be rebadged as an M, > and I said...safe bet... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Buzz > > Hausner > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 6:30 PM > > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > > Subject: RE: [Leica] Konica HEXAR RF Lenses reviewed in CI #220 > > > > > > The Good Doctor forgot to include his message...which we all > > await eagerly! > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 8:14 AM > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: RE: [Leica] Konica HEXAR RF Lenses reviewed in CI #220 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I bet you both a roll of film the Hexar gets rebadged as a > > > Leica M-type. > > A sure bet for you! ;-)...But as to the other?..Dream on! > > > > > Maybe this will force Leica into the modern world. Maybe they will > > > actually develop a new body on their own too? God, what's next?! > > > (An AF R camera, I bet!) > > > > > > >