Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tom, Thanks for the very thorough explanation. How does the Rapidwinder compare to the Leicavit in size and weight? Bryan - ----- Original Message ----- From: <TTAbrahams@aol.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 11:14 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Leicavit (was: Jim Marshall - rock and rollphotographer!) > On 1 2/13/99 8:05:07 AM bcaldwell@softcom.net (Bryan Caldwell) wrote: > >The Leicavit was very trouble-prone. Tom A. could give you a more detailed > explanation than >I can. Another problem is that ordinarily the Leicavit will > not work with an M4/6. Marshall's >cameras have been modified to work. With > Tom's Rapidwinder available at a fraction of what >a new Leicavit would cost > - and with no modification required for M2, M4-2, M4-P, and M6, it >really > wouldn't make a lot of sense to bring back the Leicavit. > >Bryan > > The original Leicavit started of as the SCNOO rapid winder for the older > screwmount Leicas and evolved into the SYOOM Leicavit for the IIIG and IIIF. > The version introduced with the Leica MP in 1957 was for all practical > purposes a "re-bodied" SYOOM Leicavit. It was later offered as an accessory > to the M2 and M1 cameras. > I have had several of these, both in screwmount and in M2/MP combinations. > It works quite well, but it is extremely complex for what it does. It suffers > from several problems. The drive is by a chain which is prone to stretching > with use and also had a very irritating habit of breaking when you used it > heavily. The clutch was a simple spring-loaded cam type. This meant that if > you wanted to do multiple stroke advances (handy when you hold the camera > vertically), it required that you pulled the lever to a halfway point and > then when you let it go back to start, it would only engage if it is was > pulled back to were you stopped. The outside shell was made from 0.8mm brass > (same thickness as the top-plate of a brass top-plate on an M camera) and > would literally deform by squeezing it hard. The lever had a razor sharp edge > at the bottom and impromptu appendectomies were always a chance if you fell > on it! The lever lock was hinged in such a way that the lever tended to be > sloppy, even when locked down. It had a side-turn lock on it, a small lever > that stuck out from the side of the housing and that was prone to getting > stuck in clothing or facial hair (remember this was a late 50's and 60's > set-up and some of us had lots of hair then). All of these little nagging > problems notwithstanding, it is still a very jazzy little thing. It is most > unfortunate that it has taken on a collector status and now costs > multi-thousands of dollars! My last one croaked on me in the mid-80's. It was > worn beyond repair, the chain was repaired several times with great effort > and the clutch was less than reliable. It was a black paint version and it > was attached to an equally worn M2 in matching brass/black paint. I turned it > into a couple of M4-Ps and although great cameras, they had to be advanced > with the regular lever. This started the whole procedure of making my own > "Leicavit" - little did I know that 13 years later I would still be at it! > If Leica would make a Leicavit today, very few of the parts in the original > design would be useful. Modern technology has created stuff like carbon fiber > reinforced drive belts, multi pin clutches and ultra strong alloys that work > better and longer than the Leicavit of the 40' and 50'. > There are improvements that are possible to my own Rapidwinder. The lock can > be improved maybe with the introduction of a click stop at the locked end > and/or a similar type of folding key that Leica uses. The spring inside the > winder is designed for a long life and I could make it slightly softer to the > touch by reducing the spring wire diameter. This could compromise the life > span of the spring so I have resisted doing it. The dog-clutch (the part with > the teeth that engage the cameras winder drive) could be machined out of > stainless steel and surface hardened. The lever is overly large compared to > the Leicavit lever, but it is much stronger too and it has a far duller edge > to it. Less chance of inflicting punctures on you if you misuse it! > When I work on improvements on the Rapidwinder, I always try to incorporate > them in such a manner that a/ it does not affect the price and b/it can be > retrofitted to existing winders. Another design feature that I incorporated > early on in the Rapidwinder is that by trying to keep the design as simple as > possible, it allows a user to fix it or install a part supplied by me. The > Leicavit MP was not very friendly in this aspect. It contained 51 different > parts, 4 different springs and some truly weird looking parts. I did try > several time to fix broken Leicavits while on jobs, but in most cases I was > not that successful with it. For some reason the sliding bar in the drive was > a magnet for collecting mud and sand and it required several different > screwdrivers and needle nose pliers to dismantle (this was before Leatherman > Tools and commonly available Swiss Army knives). There has been many a time > when I was crawling around in hotel rooms on all four, looking for a > minuscule screw, essential for re-assembly and trying to explain to fellow > photographers "No, I haven't had anything to drink, but I am looking for a > lost screw". You don't say things like that to photographers, particularly to > the ones coming from competing newspapers. It gives far to much ammunition > for them in later bar discussions! > As for adapting a 50's Leicavit MP to a M6. It can be done, but is quite > expensive and requires the drive parts from an M4-Mot/M4-M to replace the > current "tulip". It is not a simple matter of installing just a M2 take up > shaft. If you do that, the filmcounter is rendered useless and you of course > also have to be prepared to go back to the M2/M3 take-up spool way of > loading. > Tom A > > Tom Abrahamsson > www.rapidwinder.com >