Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
While your comments about the SP and the 7 have merit, how can you say how
much dimmer the Hexar RF finder is when no one on this group has actually
seen one?
In a message dated 12/10/99 12:48:11 PM, jbcollier@home.com writes:
<< The Leica M finder is an amazing bit of optical engineering that has not
been replicated to date. The Hexar RF finder is low mag and, according to
reports on this list, noticeably dimmer than the Leica finder. The Canon 7
models are substantially larger than an M body and the finder is no where
near the quality of the Leica. The Nikon SP is dimmer yet and the 28/35
frame lines do not have parallax correction. Leica had to increase the size
of the body 2mm just to accomodate TTl flash cicuitry. I do not think that
the finder you wish could be accommodated with out a substantial increase in
body size. The present finder has all the disadvantages which we are all
aware of; but, it is bright, contrasty and offers unequaled low light
focussing ability which I prize above all else. I can focus swiftly and
accurately in light I would have trouble walking in. When someone makes a
better rangefinder I will be very impressed.
Mr. Lal wrote:
> Not so - even back in the 1950's outboard zoom finders
> for 35 mm format having a 6 x range were freely
> available. No reason to expect less today. The trick
> is, of course, to make it all fit under the M 6 top
> plate.
>
> As a last resort, although I do not believe it is
> necessary, a two or three range system can be
> implemented. A two range system might be, say, 15 - 75
> mm in the wide range, and 40 - 200 mm in the tele range.
>
> Note that the VF's of both the Canon 7 & the Nikon SP
> offered a wider range of focal lengths, albeit no zoom
> finder, than any M until the M4 P.
</XMP>
- ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <daemon@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Received: from rly-za03.mx.aol.com (rly-za03.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.99]) by
air-za01.mail.aol.com (vx) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 12:48:11 -0500
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1])
by rly-za03.mx.aol.com (v66.4) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 12:48:01 -0500
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA21873; Fri, 10 Dec 1999
09:32:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rdc1.ab.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.ab.wave.home.com
[24.64.2.50])
by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA21863; Fri, 10
Dec 1999 09:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [24.64.120.137] by mail.rdc1.ab.home.com
(InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with ESMTP
id <19991210173219.GKYC8572.mail.rdc1.ab.home.com@[24.64.120.137]>
for <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>;
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:32:19 -0800
User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:28:57 -0700
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica AF camera
From: John Collier <jbcollier@home.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Message-ID: <B4768669.440%jbcollier@home.com>
In-Reply-To: <38512B91.EAB170EA@bcc.cuny.edu>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>>