Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] about summicron 2/35mm
From: D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:22:09 +0000

Franck Maubuisson wrote:
>As there is some discussions about the summicron, here's my experience
>
>I bought a new one in early 1992 and found it disappointing and not worth its
>price..
>Well, it's not really bad, but if I want sharpness, I use another camera.
>Good contrast and colors, but unsufficient sharpness, always have to use
it between
>f/4 and f/8 if I want good pictures.
>I never could get a really  good 30x40 enlargement.
>(my Canon FD 2/35 is much sharper.)
>but it gives good slides for projection...
>
>By the way, does anyone knows if a f 3,5/35 summaro would be better at
f/11 or f/16
>?
>
>Franck
>

I wonder if you are still using this lens? What pictures are you taking
which demands such a high degree of sharpness from a lens? 

If you are not happy with the summicron, I doubt you will be happy with the
summaron. 

Dan K.


- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
                          Live one day at a time
============================================================================