Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Randy, I use the first generation (8 element) 35 Summicron as well as the current generation 50 Summicron. If I use Tri-X and compare 8x10s of real pictures between the lenses there is a definite increase in detail resoltuion and acutance with the new Summicron during wide open shooting. The difference is visible even at this relatively small enlargement size. This is most easily detectable if you look at hair for example. I have never checked for light falloff or flatness of field between the lenses because frankly I never see these things in the 35mm pictures I take. In any event, if I don't have a side by side comparison with the new 50 Summicron, the prints from the 35 Summicron still look pretty good. However, if you want the best resolution, obviously go with the current Summciron. The older 35 chrome Summicron (which I got from Tamarkin for $700 usd) is much lighter than the current ASPH35 (especially in chrome). I find that the infinity catch is a bit of pain to use but I guess I'll get used to it. Jonathan Lee - -----Original Message----- From: Randy Holst [mailto:rholst@micron.net] Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 12:49 AM To: LUG Subject: [Leica] 35/f2 Summicron - Genesis to Judgement Day Hello all, I've been (somewhat) trying to follow the discussion on the Aspheric lenses, which has led me into another question. While attempting to familiarize myself with the evolution of the Leitz 35/f2 lens (for a future purchase), I've found that: In the beginning, there was the 8 element Summicron 35/f2 and it was good. Then came the 6 element Summicron 35/f2, which was purported to be gooder. That then beget the 7 element Summicron-M 35/f2, which had to be even 'M'ore gooder. Finally came the prodigiously priced Summicron 35/f2 Aspherical, which has got to be Immaculate in Conception. This lens has gone through more versions than Nikon's equivalent 35/f2 for their SLR's. Can anyone explain to me what these improvements actually mean in terms of sharpness, color, contrast, distortion, etc.? Under what conditions would I notice a difference between the first and last versions? Randy Holst Boise, Idaho