Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Stewart, Alistair wrote: >Dan, > >How about > > >Best value one lens outfit: Leica ii + summarit. > >Better value one lens outfit: m2/4-2/4-p + 35 non-asph 'cron > >Best performance one lens outfit: m6 + 35 asph 'lux. BUt I will argue that >99% of applications don't need this level of performance > >one lens outfit, body choice controls cost: m2/4-X/6 + old 35/1.4 > >two lens outfit, body choice controls cost: m2/4-X/6 + old 35/1.4 + 50 'cron > >two body two lens outfit, body choice controls cost : m2/4/6 + old 35 lux, >and m3/6ttl + 50 'cron > >Best value two body two lens oufit: m2/4-2/4-p + 35 non-asph 'cron and m3/ + >50 'cron, (or Leicaflex + old 50 'cron.) > > >and so on.... > I think the 35 and 50 are too close to each other in focal length and I would personally not carry both. That is the reason why I would choose a longer focal length to go with the 35. Dan K. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- He who sleeps with a dream for prosperity might wake up in a nightmare. ============================================================================