Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan, I wonder if Francesco's problem has more to do with the changed style of photography. The glamour that he was doing before provides a lot of control--you pose the model, arrange the lights etc. Now he is shooting on the street, and of course you cannot have the same level of control, and you do not have the time either. This weekend I participated in a landscape photo workshop. I was using my M6 on a tripod, taking the time to really look at the scene in the finder, move the camera around to get things just right etc.--this kind of very deliberate working mode is very new to me. So Francesco may be experiencing the reverse of that. Nathan Dan S wrote: > Francesco, I have had the same experiece with my M6. The accuracy of the > frame lines in the 35mm setting leaves a bit to be desired. You have to get > used to moving in a little farther than the viewfinder indicates to get the > shot you are looking for. > > I have taken to using an old Imarect finder when I shoot with a 35. Its > image is more "accurate" and it better represents the diminishing > perspective that a wide angle lens gives. The M viewfinders just don't > communicate that perspective as well (opinion). > > Best Wishes > Dan States > > > > >Hi all...... > > > >I have not been making photographs as much as I used to. > >As you know, I used to do glamour photography for a living > >before I got this new position as Internet Developer. Now > >I barely have time to go out shooting even on weekends. > >When I do go out, I can sense the lack of practice and I > >can see it in my results. I shot a few rolls at the local > >street fair 2 weekends ago, and this past weekend I shot > >some rolls at a sidewalk painting charity event AND a > >local Oktoberfest event. > > > >I have been shooting exclusively with an M6HM and a 35/2 ASPH > >and I am finding too much fluff and garbage around the edges of > >my negatives. Feet, arms, halves of other bodies, halves of trees, > >pieces of trash on the ground, you get the idea....... > >Essentially I am wondering if the problem is with me not scoping out > >the frame completely enough or not moving in tight enough? Should > >I move to a 50/2 lens as my one, single lens? Is it easier to quickly > >study the frame with the 50 since the frame window is smaller and > >centrally located? > > > >Francesco Sanfilippo > >francesco@incsystems.com > >Webmaster & Network Administrator, > >InContact Systems, MentorU.Com > > > > > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com - -- Nathan Wajsman Overijse, Belgium General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/ Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/ Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/