Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] If you thought it was expensive...
From: "R. Saylor" <rlsaylor@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 22:58:22 -0400

4season wrote:

> You can certainly ease the
> financial bite by starting with secondhand Leica equipment, but as I've
> said before, this route isn't for everyone, and I can't say I'd always
> blame 'em--I've seen stuff advertised as "Mint Minus" which was dinged and
> obviously worn, and we're not talking faint blemishes either.
>
The significance of the ratings depend, of course, on the dealer. I 
got my M6 from KEH. Rated LN-, it looked as if it never even had a 
lens mounted on it. From all reports, DC's ratings seem to be 
accurate also. I think KEH is always conservatively rated: EX+ is 
almost perfect, and LN- is perfect.

Obviously, except for collectors, the important factor is how it works. 
An excellent M6 system with 3 of the most useful focal length lenses 
can probably be had for under $3500.

Richard