Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > The biggest problem with the M6 is not that it is a bad > > camera (it's a great camera, and progress will not alter > > that fact), but that it has stood still for too long. > > This statement seems to contradict itself. The M6 is a great camera, > and progress will not alter its greatness--but it must not stand > still? Why can't it remain the same if it is a great camera and is > destined to remain so? It's either great, or it isn't. It's gear, a tool. Unlike (ideal) art, tools are not timeless. Otherwise we'd still be contently living in the stone age. Some of those cave-drawings are actually quite nice. But I prefer a camera. Bernard