Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Robert Stevens wrote; > >As for lag time, I noticed with hokey things happen pretty quick. It is >hard to anticipate when the player will make a shot on goal. The goalie >has a hard enough time of it let alone me. With a quicker release time, >the puck move a shorter distance before the picture is exposed. A link to >two examples of this are below. These were from last weeks game of the >QMJHL in Halifax.>>>>>> Robert, It doesn't matter how far the puck moved or the release time was or is...you have two very fine hockey pictures. The puck is in the net, where it should be in any good hockey picture, it's all in focus and the exposure is correct. So what's with the release Lag time? You see you're just a damn good sports shooter, so the next time you see some cock -a-mamy article on any of this lag stuff or other techie crap, throw the magazine out, pour yourself a drink, relax and just go do your thing at any sport you wish. I don't doubt that Canon or Nikon has some kind of delay due to the auto everything bits and pieces, but I still don't believe it makes that much difference to a top notch sports shooter with excellent reflexes. For example, Gary Hershorn a wire guy for Reuters. As a sports shooter he has the fastest re-action time I've ever seen, picture after picture...peak peak action! And he uses Canon EOS whatever, I'd bet if we asked him if he ever considered lagtime he would say no or he wouldn't know what you were talking about. :) Looking at your two hockey pictures, just keep doing what your doing and don't think about anything else. :) have a good shoot next week. ted Ted Grant This is Our Work. The Legacy of Sir William Osler. http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant