Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] re: Digital Prints
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 18:08:14 -0000

God! I love it! I no longer produce crappy "inkjet" prints - I produce
artful Giclee prints!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Tim
> Atherton
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 1999 9:57 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] re: Digital Prints
>
>
> > Tim or Tina -
> > Forgive my lack of knowledge, but what is a Giclee printer? Is
> > this a fancy
> > name for inkjet?
> >
> > Thanks..
> > B. D.
>
> Yes - it is basically French for squirt!
>
> It was coined by one of the early digital printers (don't
> recall who) when
> they used exotic, high end, esoteric machines. But he didn't
> Trademark the
> term so it became generic for these kind of inkjet printers.
>
> Until recently, it was used for the Iris printers/prints and suchlike.
> However, it is no becoming used as a more general term for
> inkjet prints.
> Rather in the same was as you will often see "art"
> photography described as
> gelatin Silver (good old B&W) or dye transfer (a good old Ilfochrome I
> think) etc. -  fancy names for a fairly normal, if well
> crafted process.
>
> Of course, with inkjet/giclee these can vary from simple
> Epson prints with
> Epson inks on Epson papers, to prints (still using for e.g.
> Epsons, some of
> which are quite "high end"), but using archival colour or
> Quadtone b&w inks
> on various archival (watercolour or other) papers some with
> archival ratings
> the same or better than Ilfochromes etc.
>
> And yes, the Epson list gets more mail than the LUG.
>
>
> Tim
>
>