Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It has always been my contention that these "great" old photographers were great, not because of their work, but because they were first. Jim At 05:02 PM 9/29/99 +0000, B. D. Colen wrote: > >WOW! I certainly don't disagree, and while we're baring our souls...I'd like >to suggest that Eisenstadt was and is greatly overrated. Yes, some of his >images are iconic. But that doesn't mean they are automatically great >photographs. Even he has acknowledged that the Times Square kiss is not a >particularly remarkable photo. Most of his photos appear to be the result of >his having gained access to the rich and famous, which is a credit to the >power of Life, and also to what is pretty universally described as his own >wonderful personality. But those photos of the rich and famous live on, I >would contend, because of who they are of, not because, with some >exceptions, they are in and of themselves great photographs. I know, I know, >the photo of Goebels is truly remarkable. But that doesn't make Eisie a >"great." > >But, hey, everybody who is vaguely interest in photography knows who he >is..so... >