Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dave: One other not in addition to my previous post. Check the mounting flange on the camera to ensure the screws are tight. I had the screws loosen up on a camera that I had the 180 mounted to and luckly nocticed a bit of play and tightend them up with a screwdriver I had in my bag. Regards, Robert At 12:24 AM 9/28/99 -0400, you wrote: >Well, I got my 180mmf2 back last Monday from Leica NJ. Leica did a nice job. > >My first assignment(s) I decided to use it for were volleyball and some night >football. One request I had was to get some shots of the new coach who is 7-8 >months pregnant and very camera shy. During the match I just located myself at >the end of the bench area and fired away. I was no more than 15-20 feet away. >Shooting at 1/125 and f2, I latched the focuse to her eyebrows. I was using my >R5 with the matte screeen. I was very impressed on being able to focus on >individual hairs in her eyebrows and eyelashes. I was using a monopod and >oriented the camera vertical to use the front release on the R-motor. Everything >seemed solid as I shot. > >When I examined the negatives, her face was way out of focus! In fact the focus >was on her near shoulder (rather sharp fabric/textures). > >The day before I had "practised" by shooting a girl's basketball game where I >noticed the shots I took of the bench exhibited this peculiar trait: my subject >on the right was out of focus, but items to the left (in camera) were in focus. >In fact, the subject girl wasout of focus but the girl on her right (left in >camera) was in sharp focus. > >I have used matte screens in my Canon's for more than 15 years (F1n:SC/SJ/SK) >where I often used my 85mmf1.2L wide open with very good success (great lens!), >and I shoot a 300mmf2.8L wide open as well for hockey with considerable success >(another great lens!). I also use my EOS1 with its matte screen in manual mode >at maximum aperatures. > >The R5 was purchased used from Jim Kuehl in May or June. I set the diopter >adjustment and it hasn't been budged since. My opinion is that the screen is not >held in place correctly or the mirror is out of alignment. > >HAS ANYONE HAD SIMILAR PROBLEMS OR KNOW HOW I CAN VERIFY THIS? > >Come to think about it, when I shoot outdoors, I usually use a smaller aperature >which gives more DOF. This will explain why some shots I swore I nailed were a >bit soft! > >Another thing that comes to mind is the focus screen may not be compatible with >a 180mm lens which is also an 2 aperature. Maybe ther eis another screen I can >try. The Canon F-1n FN-SK screen was optimized for 300mm lenses or longer and it >showed. It could not be used for shorter lenses. So maybe the R matte screen is >the problem? > >Opinions requested. > >Regards, > >Dave Strang >dstrang@up.net > >----Pentium Pro/Windows NT 4-SP3/Zip100/Zip250/Jaz2GB/Astra 600S scanner/RedHat >Linux 5.0/MSVC++ 5.0/MSVC++ 6.0/PowerStation Fortran 4.0/Photoshop >4.01/Photoshop 5.0/Illustrator 7.01/KPT 3.0/KPT 5.0/PhotoTools 3.0/Portfolio >4.0/Total XAOS/Matlab 5.0/Maple V/Office 97 Pro+SR2/MacOpener 4.0/AMIGA >1000/AMIGA 2000-GVP030 Combo/AMIGA 3000(2)/Indigo 2 XZ/IRIX 5.3/IRIX 6.2/ and >member of UP.NET! > > > > > > > >