Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bryan Caldwell wrote: > >>Not in the US. That's called prior restraint, and is unconstitutional > here. << ><Snip> . There are other areas where prior > restraint on publication has been upheld by the courts and areas where > constitutional scholars suspect that it might be upheld. > > Usually found unconstitutional? Yes. Per se unconstitutional? No. > Bryan > From: Eric Welch <ewelch@ponyexpress.net> ><Snip> > > At 10:04 PM 9/21/99 -0500, Paul Schiemer wrote: > > >See, that's where I believe you missed the point I was trying to make: > > >It's not the taking of the photo but the use of it afterward. ><Snip> I'm glad we have lawyers here! :) This stuff impresses the heck out of me! Mark Rabiner