Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]“Anthony Atkielski” <anthony@atkielski.com> wrote: >I'm always surprised by the loud, short, snappy “pop” sound of most real life movie explosions, as opposed to the prolonged >blast sound one hears on the soundtrack. I read once that the soundtrack versions come from extremely large military >explosions, far beyond the size of the movie explosions for which they are used. >-- Anthony I'm not a combat veteran, but when I was an infantryman we played with things that go bang quite a bit - demo charges, Bangalore Torpedoes, Claymore mines, hand granades and M203 grenades, etc. etc. You are right, the movies (with the exception, imho, of Saving Private Ryan) have the sound all wrong. You don't really hear an explosion so much as feel it, but I don't see how any movie can really recreate the effect of feeling your kidneys vibrate in your body which is an effect that even a little hand grenade will produce. Incidentally, I was startled by how much real machine guns sound like the ones in the movies. But I have yet to see a war movie that faithfully reproduces the tinny little "kak!" sound of a real M16 - it's just not impressive enough. And the M203's "bloop!" sound just plain funny. I think there is a difference between this and sound added to archival footage which should certainly be as accurate as possible. But I think we can grant fiction movies some artistic license. For example, when they show an explosion there is the obligatory ball of flame which is ludicrous, but understandable given that real explosions are pretty boring to see - a flash and a puff of smoke. The real damage is caused by the invisible shock wave of rapidly produced gasses and the equally invisible rapidly moving debris. Which is why you normally don't watch it, of course. Simon Stevens