Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Martin Howard wrote: > It will also let you explore the quality of Leica lenses, while the > Summicrons with their f/2 maximum aperture may not be the fastest > thing around, should allow you to do quite a fair bit of available > light stuff with moderately fast film, such as Tri-X. Tri-X? Faster lenses are nice and handy. I understand that, and if I could trade in my summicrons for summiluxes without losing money, I would do so. However, I can't say I'm actually suffering without that extra stop. And now I read about Tri-X, which in real life is ISO320. Guys.... are you all shooting inside abandoned coalmines?? When I go shooting cityscapes, I take my R-24/2.8, screw on an orange filter (two stop light loss) and load APX25. Then I try to stay away from full open, and use f/4 as my standard aperture. That puts me 8.5 stops (!!) away from a summilux at wide open, without filter and with Tr-X. But I get along very nicely with that setup, even on a semi-overcast day. If the weather is really bad (I try not to shoot with really bad weather for artistic reasons anyway), and for shots closer to the evening, I will need a monopod. With fair weather I can shoot without any supports. And no, I don't use flash inside. I hate flash. Flash is something I use for studio shots only. Bernard.