Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan Post wrote: >>>>>>>>>I was wondering that the relative size or diameter of the entry aperture of the lenses have any effect on bokeh and the overall quality of the image? The Noctilux has a very large front element, albeit to gather as much light as possible, and to funnel it into maw of that great lens. Perhaps, the large opening, when translated to the interior, the out of focus portions have a greater aberration due to the relatively large angle that some of the light must traverse.<<<<<<<<<<< Dan, this seems like a plausible theory - but, to be honest, though these things are absorbing and fun to think about, and some of the things that we hear about lens performance seem to make such nice sense - like the fact that symmetrical non-retrofocus designs like the Super Angulon have inherently fewer aberrations - simple is best - I feel that I am about as far from understanding photographic lens optical design and effects as the ancients were from understanding how the solar system works - or as far as we still are from really understanding how the mind works. People like Erwin are like the neuro-scientists of optics - they understand quite a lot about what is going on inside, but are only too aware of how desperately complex a mixture the sum is of the parts - and people like us that are interested in the way the lenses work are like the psychologists who attempt to understand what goes on in the brain by looking at what it can and can't do when it is damaged in particular ways - we make deductions from what we see the lenses doing in varying circumstances but we don't have a very good idea of why things work the way they do. I suppose the fact that it's not an exact science gives all the more strength to the mystique, and makes experimenting with the differences between lenses so absorbing and addictive. All the best, Simon.