RE: [Leica] Leica 280 2.8 versus Canon 300 2.8, a challenge

["Ben Ho ^_^" <longjohn@netvigator.com>]

Hi Robert,

First I must admit, I am guessing here.  Is the left one by leica?  (It's
seems more stands out and crispy.)

Very curious.



Regards
Ben :)





> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Robert G.
> Stevens
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 12:22 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] Leica 280 2.8 versus Canon 300 2.8, a challenge
>
>
>
>
> I have posted a web page with two soccer pictures, one taken with a Canon
> 300 2.8 EOS and EOS 1n with the other taken with a Leica 280 2.8 and R8.
> Why don't we do a survey and see if people can tell which is the Leica
> shot.  Both were done on the same film (RSX 100 II) and in the evening.
> One is on grass, the other on artificial turf and no direct sun.  If you
> click on the images, they will bring up a larger image.  Pay attention to
> detail in the black shorts.  Is the Leica picture the one on the left or
> the right?
>
> http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/Misc.htm
>
> The train pictures on the top of the page were both taken with the 180 APO
> Summicron on the older and less sharp RSX 100 film.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>