Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan was correct in his criticism of the different lighting. I searched my files and found two images taken on the same field, at the same time of day in the same lighting. One with an autofocus Canon 300 2.8, the other with a Leica lens. Guess which is which and what lens was used on the Leica. Click on the images for bigger sizes. Both were straight scans where I left the scanner software to figure out everything. http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/Misc.htm Regards, Robert At 07:11 PM 8/18/99 GMT, you wrote: >This is a little unfair. The one on the right will of course look better >since it is taken in direct afternoon sunlight. The shot on the left is >somewhat underexposed, and is taken in flat lighting. If the shots were >identically lit I seriously doubt you could tell the difference on a >computer monitor, if at all. > >A more valid test would be with identical subjects shot at identical lens >settings, and using tripods. > >Best wishes >Dan > > > >> >> > Is the Leica picture the one on the left or the right? >> > >> > http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/Misc.htm >> >>No question, on the right. It shows up even over the web. >>Much more snap, much better tonality, better shadow detail. >> >>Paul Chefurka > > >_______________________________________________________________ >Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com > >