Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]ABSOLUTELY, way to go Marc! GS PS, TomA does not have a metal organ. >From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Old Leicas and better than the new "Junk" Cameras >Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 18:44:00 -0400 > >At 05:27 PM 8/11/1999 -0500, Greg Chappell wrote: > >There ARE more products today made better than comparable products of 50 > >years ago (cameras included), but just ask people like Sherry Krauter at > >Golden Touch Camera Repair if that applies to M4's vs. the new M6's being > >produced today, comparing part to part. You can probably reverse, to some > >extent, what you said below. I own both an M6 and M4 and LOVE both, but >the > >M4 IS a better built camera. > > >For all of the many reasons pointed out by myself and others for so many >years, this Just Is Not True. It is an urban myth. The M6 is the best >built, best designed Leica RF camera ever. > >Marc > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com