Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I always do this. And you obviously know, that I know, how the M system works. The reason for mounting and focusing the M lens is to "get the feel" of it. Does it focus "smoothly", is there any "play" is there any focus "backlash" ? These are the important things to look for. About three weeks ago there was a used 35/1.4, non ASPH, for $695 at KSP. Glass was perfect. Focus and f/stop rings were worn from use. I was interested. After mounting the lens and putting the camera to my eye, I found backlash in the focus mechanism. This is difficult to spot unless you are looking through the viewfinder, watching the split image NOT MOVE while you move the focus ring. This is also the best way to detect tight spots in the focusing continuum. I did not buy the lens. Actually, mounting and testing the lens mechanism, is smart, not stupid. Jim At 11:57 PM 8/10/99 -0700, you wrote: >Bernard Delgado wrote: >> >> >It's amusing to watch people in camera stores checking out a Leica M lens, >> >by mounting it on a camera, and looking through the viewfinder. I wonder >> >if they ever see something they don't like? >> > >> >Dan C. >> > >> Just the lens shade in the viewfinder. >> -delgado > >I have a friend who has some Leica M stuff who claimed one lens was easier to >focus with than another. >I had to tell him he was not focusing through the lens and the focusing squre >was the same thing for all the lenses. >He then had to think of another excuse to sell the lens and buy another toy. >Mark Rabiner