Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark- Must've snipped that which I included from someone else's message... and I dump messages once read and not answered directly, so I can't say 'who'... Anyway- I muddled out my own medium tech solution. Like You, I could never judge a print in the dark under a safelight. I do all mine, usually, face down for the total time, then stop, and fix. I rarely try to 'save' a print- it usually wouldn't work and if I got it wrong to begin with, well, the heck with it- try again! Dan - ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Print Development Time > Dan Post wrote: > ><snip> > > For a low-tech solution, Ansel describes a factor development kind of thing > > in, I believe, his Print book. Can anyone verify this? If I remember > > correctly, this technique involves locking down parameters based on when > > certain values appear as the print develops. All other print development > > times will be a factor based on the appearance of these same values. > > > > Hope this helps. Good luck. > > > > Best regards, > > Alan Huntley > > > ><snip> > > The "Yankee" approach to printing which for me is "yanking" out the print not at > a specific time but when it looks good in the safelight had always been > considered lowest level technique for me. A definition of no technique or > commitment to quality work. > That Ansel would get involved with techniques such as this is a inspiration as > his mind always remained not entrenched but always opened. He said there are > advantages consistency wise with this technique. I've read his description of > these techniques a dozen times and I think to get into it and/or appreciate it a > workshop would be required. Safelights are of course also an issue as you are > developing by inspection, waiting for a tone to appear and then going on from > there. It didn't appeal to me. > Ansel also stretched known parameters by getting involved so I hear with the > Phillips Tri color head which made automatic ring arounds in his black and white printing. > So many people picture him with his view camera and western clothing and would > assume he would be the epitome of die hard archaic Zone 64 technique. When quite > the opposite had always been true. > Mark Rabiner