Re: [Leica] Re: If Porsche Can Do It, Why Not Leica?

["Bud Cook" <budcook@ibm.net>]

Jim,
Are we talking reliability by Detroit's standards or by Toyota/Mercedes
standards?

If I'm to spend $66K for a Range Rover, I'd expect world-class technology
and world-class reliability.   The current engine is not what I'd expect nor
what I'd pay for.

I had really high expectations when BMW took over but it seems that Munich
hasn't done much to change things.

BTW, engine braking is pretty much a function of engine size and compression
ratio.  I can't understand why Land Rovers aren't available in the U.S. with
a diesel engine.  Mercedes Benz has a new twin-turbo, rail injected diesel
V8 coming that produces over 400 ft.lb. of torque.  It would be perfect in a
Range Rover:-)

Bud

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Laurel <jplaurel@microsoft.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 3:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: If Porsche Can Do It, Why Not Leica?


> The old pushrod V8 is an extremely trustworthy engine.  Not terribly fast
or
> fuel efficient, but dead reliable and very strong, especially at low RPM.
> There has been discussion about using BMW's new V8's in Land Rover
products
> for some time.  As I understand it, the problem with this is that the BMW
> V8s do not provide sufficient torque at low RPM for off-road conditions,
and
> they have insufficient engine braking.
>
> --Jim