Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] A most daring proposition.
From: Buzz Hausner <Buzz@marianmanor.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 08:09:02 -0400

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

- ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEDF3B.4EA4F1B0
Content-Type: text/plain

In a message dated 8/4/99 12:42:54 AM Central Daylight Time, 
LEICAMAN56@aol.com writes:

<< 
 The vertical adjustment of the rangefinder patch, on the other hand, does
go 
 out of adjustment rather easily, and before the M6, was easily adjusted in 
 1-2 minutes.  Since the M6 and cost cutting measures by Leica, the 
adjustment now can only be made with a special tool and necessitates
removing the "red 
 dot."  Apparently Leica felt they could set this once at the factory, put a

 spot of shellac on the threads, and it would be maintenance free.  Wrong.  
 The old, more adjustable mechanism was much better and more easily set than

 the new one. >>

In response to which, DonjRXXX eloquently posed,

<<Why can't Solms go back to the better mechanism?>>

Look, Junior, if this is an urgent matter to you, why don't you contact
someone in Solms and find out?  Really, if you detect such serious problems
with Leica equipment, why don't you go out and document the problems rather
than just trolling the LUG for messages you can twist to suit your
prejudices.

- ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEDF3B.4EA4F1B0
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.0.1460.9">
<TITLE>RE: [Leica] A most daring proposition.</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>In a message dated 8/4/99 12:42:54 AM Central =
Daylight Time, </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>LEICAMAN56@aol.com writes:</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>&lt;&lt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp;The vertical adjustment of the rangefinder =
patch, on the other hand, does go </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp;out of adjustment rather easily, and before =
the M6, was easily adjusted in </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp;1-2 minutes.&nbsp; Since the M6 and cost =
cutting measures by Leica, the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>adjustment now can only be made with a special tool =
and necessitates removing the &quot;red </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp;dot.&quot;&nbsp; Apparently Leica felt they =
could set this once at the factory, put a </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp;spot of shellac on the threads, and it would =
be maintenance free.&nbsp; Wrong.&nbsp; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp;The old, more adjustable mechanism was much =
better and more easily set than </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&nbsp;the new one. &gt;&gt;</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>In response to which, DonjRXXX eloquently =
posed,</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>&lt;&lt;Why can't Solms go back to the better =
mechanism?&gt;&gt;</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Look, Junior, if this is an urgent matter to you, why =
don't you contact someone in Solms and find out?&nbsp; Really, if you =
detect such serious problems with Leica equipment, why don't you go out =
and document the problems rather than just trolling the LUG for =
messages you can twist to suit your prejudices.</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
- ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEDF3B.4EA4F1B0--